ALEXANDRIA, VA — The election of an African-American president
— which showed that the vast majority of Americans were prepared to
judge a candidate on his merits rather than on race — brought widespread
hope that it would usher in a “post-racial” society. In
recent days, however, we have seen the issue of race injected into
a debate in which it is largely irrelevant — President Obama’s
plan to overhaul the nation’s health care system.
Former President Jimmy Carter declared racism to be the subtext of
many of the attacks against the president’s health care plan,
and members of the Congressional Black Caucus point to race as a driving
force behind the current level of animosity. Mr. Carter declared, “An
overwhelming portion of the intensely demonstrated animosity toward
President Barack Obama is based on the fact that he is a black man.”
Some Americans may still harbor racist sentiments. In some rare
instances, racist signs and slogans have appeared at rallies opposing
the Obama health care plan. There is no evidence, however, that
the health care debate is in any way motivated by race. Real disagreements
exist about how best to alter the health care delivery system. Liberals
and conservatives, Republicans and Democrats, should be able to disagree
— even with the occasional use of heated rhetoric — without being
accused of racism.
President
Obama himself says that he does not believe his race was the cause
of fierce criticism aimed at his administration in the contentious
health care debate; the cause was the sense of suspicion and distrust
that many Americans have in their government. “Are there people
out there who don’t like me because of race? I’m sure
they are,” Mr. Obama said. “That’s not the overriding
issue here.... Now there are some who are, setting aside the issue
of race, actually I think are more passionate about the idea of whether
government can do anything right. And I think that that’s
probably the biggest driver of some of the vitriol.”
For some black politicians, playing the race card has become second
nature. New York Governor David A. Patterson lashed out at critics
in August who say he should not run for re-election. He suggested that
he was being undermined by an orchestrated, racially biased effort
by the media to force him to step aside.
With Governor Patterson’s approval ratings remaining low, some
Democrats, including President Obama, have suggested publicly that
he should make way for the popular attorney general, Andrew Cuomo,
in the governor’s race. Even among black voters, Patterson’s
support is declining. A Sienna College poll showed that black
voters, by a margin of 46 to 38 percent, would prefer someone other
than Mr. Patterson as governor. David Dinkins, New York City's first
black mayor, offered some blunt advice to Governor Patterson: Don’t
accuse your critics of racism. “Definitely, he should get
off the racist thing,” Mr. Dinkins said.
While political charges of white racism appear to be aimed at phantoms,
a real example of black racism in American politics has been largely
ignored. In Memphis, former Mayor Willie Herenton, who is black, is
challenging Rep. Steve Cohen (D-TN), who is white, in the Democratic
primary. The candidates are battling to represent the Ninth Congressional
District, a low-income area that is more than 60 percent black. The
district was redrawn and renumbered in l973, increasing the percentage
of minority voters; for three decades, it elected the state’s
only black members of Congress since Reconstruction.
In
2006, however, Mr. Cohen, who had long represented the district in
the Tennessee State Senate, defeated a divided field of black candidates. He
easily won re-election last year against a black corporate lawyer.
Mr. Cohen is a liberal Democrat who considered joining the Congressional
Black Caucus, wrote a national apology for slavery and the Jim Crow
laws, and received an “A” rating from the NAACP. “I
vote like a 45-year-old black woman,” he said in an interview.
Mr.
Herenton and Rep. Cohen do not disagree upon any major political issues. Indeed,
Mr. Herenton’s only complaint against Rep. Cohen is a racial
one: he is white. “This seat was set aside for people who
look like me,” said Herenton's campaign manager, Sidney Chism,
a black county commissioner. “It was set aside so that blacks
could have representation.”
In the last election, his opponent ran a much-criticized advertisement
that tried to link Rep. Cohen, who is Jewish, to the Ku Klux Klan. It
juxtaposed Cohen with an image of a hooded Klansmen. In a radio interview,
Herenton declared: “This congressional race, you know what
it’s going to be about? It’s going to be about race,
representation, and power.”
If Mr. Herenton’s standard is that black constituents can only
be represented by a black congressman, how would he justify President
Obama, or Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick, or New York Governor
David Patterson — black officials who have largely white constituencies?
Racism
should be objectionable to all Americans of good will. But for many
years a view has been expressed that only whites can be guilty of racism. Twenty
years ago, Rep. Gus Savage (D-IL) declared that, “Racism constitutes
actions or thoughts of expression by white Americans against Afro-Americans...
blacks don’t have the power to oppress white people. Racism
is white. There is no black racism.”
In reality, racism is hardly a uniquely white phenomenon. Sadly,
men and women throughout the world have persecuted others on the basis
of race, religion, and ethnic origin. The partition of British
India into India and Pakistan in l947 was accomplished by the
slaughter of more than one million Hindus and Moslems. In Malaysia,
the political and economic power of ethnic Chinese has been curbed
by law and practice. In Thailand, second-generation and even third-generation
ethnic Vietnamese are denied citizenship rights. Idi Amin of Uganda
expelled his country’s entire Indian minority. We are all
too aware of acts of genocide based on race or religion in Nazi Germany,
Cambodia, and Rwanda.
Those who condemn white racism must also condemn black racism — and
racism of every variety. The use of the term “white racism” as
an epithet for those who simply disagree with President Obama’s
agenda cheapens that term. It is like the boy’s false cry
of “Wolf" — when a real wolf appears, his cries will go
unheeded. Americans of all races — and all political views —
deserve better than this.
The Conservative Curmudgeon archives
The Conservative Curmudgeon is copyright © 2009
by Allan C. Brownfeld and the Fitzgerald
Griffin Foundation.
All rights reserved. Editors may use this column if this copyright information
is included.
Allan C. Brownfeld is the author of five books, the latest of which
is The Revolution Lobby (Council for Inter-American Security). He has
been a staff aide to a U.S. Vice President, Members of Congress, and
the U.S. Senate Internal Subcommittee.
He is associate editor of The Lincoln Reveiw and a contributing
editor to such publications as Human Events,
The St. Croix Review, and The Washington Report on Middle
East Affairs.
The Fitzgerald Griffin Foundation needs your help to continue making
these columns available. To make a tax-deductible donation, click
here.