MINOT, NORTH DAKOTA — In theory, our political representatives
are elected to act on our behalf. We expect them to act in our best
interests and, at a minimum, to be aware of what they are voting to
impose on those of us they represent.
Unfortunately, those we elect to represent us in Congress rarely read
the bills on which they vote. These bills when enacted become the laws
we are required to follow — laws that affect our lives, businesses,
and prosperity. Elected officials who fail to read and understand proposed
legislation, and consult with those they represent, mock the very concept
of representative government.
The U.S. House of Representatives is debating a 1,018-page bill titled, “America’s
Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009” — a title that is more
of a marketing ploy than an accurate or informative description. It
was not introduced and made public until July 14, 2009, less than two
weeks before the President’s deadline. That was far too little
time to meaningfully study, debate, and consider a bill that will so
dramatically affect our lives. While those pushing this bill argue
it is not a nationalization of health care, a careful reading leaves
no doubt that nationalization is exactly what this bill does.
Rep. John Conyers, (D-MI), a prime sponsor of this bill, is an attorney
and Chairman of the House Committee on the Judiciary. He owes the American
public a fiduciary duty as both an elected official and attorney. Unlike
Rep. Conyers, I have read the bill. If enacted as introduced, it will
change what health care Americans receive and how it is delivered.
The bill directly puts unelected committees in charge of determining
what health insurance entities must offer and what they cannot offer.
It also puts the IRS in charge of enforcing its provisions.
The bill would require employers to fund 60 percent of a family medical
plan and 72.5 percent of an individual plan. Employers who fail to
do so will face IRS fines of 8 percent of the payroll. The self-employed
who fail to comply will be fined 2.5 percent of their gross income
up to an amount equal to what an unelected committee determines. Interestingly,
no one is asking why an employer should be responsible for anyone’s
health care in the first place. Nor is anyone asking what the impact
of such financial impositions on business will be. Increased unemployment
is one guaranteed consequence.
Health costs have risen dramtically over the last 40 years. The increase
in the cost and complexity of health care is due to three factors —
the advent of Medicare, the explosion of malpractice litigation, and
excessive time and cost imposed on pharmaceutical companies to bring
medications to the U.S. marketplace.
Not a single section, phrase, or word in the bill addresses any of
these problems. Instead, if passed, Americans will be told what medical
services they may have. While the rhetoric promises affordable health
care for everyone, the bill promises only limited options and limited
care. As for representative government? The President admits he has
not read the bill, yet he is aggressively campaigning for Congress
to impose it on us.
On July 27, 2009, when asked if he had read the bill, Rep. Conyers
said, “I love these members, they get up and say, ‘Read
the bill’. What good is reading the bill if it’s a thousand
pages and you don’t have two days and two lawyers to find out
what it means after you read the bill?”
Conyers controls the schedule. Why doesn’t he make sure there
is time to read the bill? As for needing two lawyers — he is a lawyer.
If the bill is so complex it takes “two lawyers” to understand
what it means, maybe there is something terribly wrong with the bill
itself as well as the process. Possibly it is complex so people won’t
understand what it actually does.
If you like the IRS, if you like how Social Security works, if you
like welfare and Medicare, then you will love national health care
— oops — that
is, “America’s Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009.”
Oh yes, 93 members of the House of Representative agreed to read the
bill before voting on it. Those who have read it oppose it. Maybe every
American who cherishes meaningful choices should also read it.
A Voice from Fly-Over
A Voice from Fly-Over Country is copyright © 2009 by Robert
L. Hale and the Fitzgerald Griffin
All rights reserved.
Robert L. Hale received his J.D. in law from Gonzaga University Law
School in Spokane, Washington. He is founder and director of a non-profit
public interest law firm. For more than three decades he has been involved
in drafting proposed laws and counseling elected officials in ways
to remove burdensome and unnecessary rules and regulations.
See a complete biographical sketch.
To subscribe or donate to the FGF E-Package online or
send a check to:
P.O. Box 1383
Vienna, VA 22183