The phrase stopped me in my tracks: “Government Greed.” I
thought I was the only one who ever used it, and suddenly there it
was, the title of a Wall Street Journal editorial. Should I congratulate
the paper for a conceptual breakthrough, or sue for copyright violation?
Greed used to mean an unscrupulous appetite for other people’s
money, typified by the highwayman and the embezzler. In the age of
limitless government it has come to mean the simple desire to keep
your own money. Politicians proposing tax cuts are “pandering
to greed and selfishness.”
But nobody accuses the government of greed, no matter how heavily
it taxes us. Government is assumed to be entitled to take as much of
the citizens’ wealth as it desires.
By the same token, nobody accuses public employees and welfare recipients
of greed for wanting to live on money taken by force (under threat
of fines and imprisonment) from people who have to earn a living in
the voluntary economy.
Tax Freedom Day is the day when the taxpayer stops working for the
government and starts working for himself. In effect, the taxpayer
now works for the government until early June. Nearly half our earnings
go to the government; by some calculations, the real amount is much
more than half, when you take into account such factors as hidden taxes
on the products we buy with our remaining money.
Observing Tax Freedom Day is a great idea, but we need a historical
standard of comparison. When did Tax Freedom Day fall in 1775? How
much of that year did the American taxpayer work for the allegedly
tyrannical King George III?
In those days there was no income tax, and Americans were enraged
when the king raised excise taxes on certain goods by a few pennies.
So Tax Freedom Day must have fallen pretty early — around mid
At what point are taxes too high — so high that they create
what amounts to “involuntary servitude”? It’s a sign
of the times that even the U.S. Supreme Court, which specializes in
discovering new meanings in the Constitution, hasn’t found “penumbras” and “emanations” in
the Thirteenth Amendment, applying it in ways its authors never imagined.
If pornography falls under “the freedom of speech [and] of the
press,” if the Fifth Amendment somehow requires that criminal
suspects be advised of their rights, if abortion is protected by a
penumbral “privacy” (which isn’t even mentioned in
the Constitution), then why should “involuntary servitude” be
construed so narrowly as to mean only chattel slavery, and not servitude
to the state?
After all, the Thirteenth Amendment makes no distinction between servitude
to the state and servitude to a private master. It should be construed
to forbid excessive taxes and military conscription as well as chattel
slavery. You can be a slave without wearing shackles and being whipped.
But alas, we have no commonly accepted criteria of proper and improper
uses of the taxing power. How much is too much? This question is hard
to answer when there are no limits on the functions of the state. Government
now claims authority over everything from preschool education to outer
space, over what we eat and how much water we have in our toilets.
Good old King George left such decisions to his subjects, even though
he never had to worry about being reelected.
If government were confined to a few specific functions, such as protecting
us from crime and foreign invasion, then we could say that we were
being illegally taxed whenever it spent money for unauthorized functions.
Nobody should be forced to pay a penny for educational and cultural
activities, for example.
In fact, nobody should be forced to pay for anything that benefits
other people but not himself. This is axiomatic. Being compelled to
support other people is surely “involuntary servitude.” If
taxation can be justified at all, it must be for the common good, not
for the advantage of some at the expense of others.
Otherwise, government becomes an instrument of depredation and extortion — as
indeed it now is. People like me can use it to rob people like you,
and vice versa. Modern democracy serves organized greed.
Copyright © 2011 by the Fitzgerald
Griffin Foundation. All rights reserved. This column was published originally
by Griffin Internet Syndicate on July 11, 2000.
Joe Sobran was an author and a syndicated columnist. See bio
and archives of some of his columns.
Watch Sobran's last TV appearance on YouTube.
Learn how to get a tape of his last speech
during the FGF Tribute to Joe Sobran in December 2009.
To subscribe to or renew the FGF E-Package, or support the writings of Joe
Sobran, please send a tax-deductible donation to the:
Fitzgerald Griffin Foundation
P.O. Box 1383
or subscribe online.