ARLINGTON, VA — It is natural for God to remain hidden precisely
because he places such a premium on faith. He is transcendent, utterly
beyond the categories of our minds and unreachable except by his own
initiative.
From a different aspect, however, the hiddenness of God is a wrenching
reality, the result not of his essential ineffability but of the human
inclination to sweep him under the rug. The so-called Enlightenment
encapsulates that very tendency. From the violent soil of a Voltaire,
hoping to see the last king strangled with the entrails of the last
priest, there sprouted the deceptively gentler tendrils of indifference
and forgetfulness. Our beloved America (not to mention dying Europe)
is today snarled in their deadly embrace.
While the nation shivers in the fear that H1N1 will emerge this fall
as a re-enactment of the Great Influenza of 1917-18, C. J. McCloskey
III has identified “affluenza” as the greater peril. We
have heard the prayer that God will comfort the afflicted and afflict
the comfortable, but the truth is that those who wallow in their comforts
do not need God to afflict them. In the midst of our affluence, we
afflict ourselves with his absence. The consequences of that absence
are severe, both to us as individuals and to the country we constitute.
Emile Durkheim (1858-1917), generally regarded as the father of sociology,
was preoccupied with the phenomenon he called “anomie,” the
gnawing sense of disconnectedness Durkheim attributed to industrialization,
urbanization, and family breakdown. Fathers and churches could no longer
instill self-discipline and the recognition of limits in their children. “Rulelessness” (the
best definition of anomie) led to widespread social pathologies and
to personal tragedies such as suicide, another topic that fascinated
Durkheim.
When he pondered the psychic mechanism that explains anomie, Durkheim
merely rediscovered an ancient truth: Every human being is born with
the desire for the infinite, for complete happiness and total satisfaction.
Because this innate desire is inherently unattainable, traditional
societies developed coping mechanisms to avoid personal despair and
social disintegration.
Thus, Buddhism espouses nirvana, a “blowing out” of all
desire and emotion so complete that the very substantiality of the “self” is
problematic. Pagan Romans and Greeks divinized their rulers, who, no
matter how licentious they themselves were, were entitled to the absolute
obedience, i.e., self-rule, of their subjects. Christians discovered
spiritual equilibrium in the example of their suffering Savior and
self-discipline in His admonition that, if we love Him, we must keep
His commandments.
Yet, these remain mere coping mechanisms. Something far beyond that,
a kind of nirvana without the obliteration of self, was discovered
by those few Christians privileged to achieve personal union with the
Infinite — Paul of Tarsus, the eremites of the desert, Francis of
Assisi, Teresa of Avila, and Julian of Norwich, among others. Such
union is attained only after terrible suffering borne patiently and
many dark nights of the soul endured steadfastly, to be sure, but so
deeply penetrates the favored one’s personality that the pathologies
of despair and anomie are left behind once and for all.
Were Durkheim here to observe 21st-century America, he would find
his theory of anomie largely validated. Certainly, few countries in
history have been so atomized as our own by the loss of norms. The “affluenza” from
which we suffer disconnects us not only from the hearths and altars
of our forebears, but from our own descendants as well, for it is they
who will bear the consequences of our profligate pursuit of “the
American dream.”
Durkheim would have been honest enough to see, I think, that the
enterprise of which he was such an important part also bears responsibility
for this sad state of affairs. It has been the march of scientific
and technological progress that induced in us the hubris to imagine
that, henceforth, mankind had no need of religious restraint, tradition,
and what Chesterton called the “democracy of the dead.” It
is science, in the main, that tells us that God is dead and that the
creation of heaven on earth is within our reach.
There is great irony in this, for it is also science that is disclosing
to us the astounding beauty and regularity of the world we inhabit
in ways much more stunning than were available to those great forebears
who saw nature’s comeliness as proof of God’s own wisdom
and beauty. From the electron microscope revealing atomic structures
and the pulsating cosmos of the cell to the Hubble telescope painting
out the reaches of cosmic arches and vaults, the awesome instruments
of scientific progress limn the beard of the face seen and loved in
those desert cells.
God hides not only himself but also, sometimes, his blessings. Perhaps
we can hope, in this dark night of our soul, that we shall not remain
blind much longer to his come-hither glance.
The Unrepentant
Traditionalist archives
The Unrepentant Traditionalist is copyright (c) 2009 by Frank
Creel and the Fitzgerald Griffin Foundation.
All rights reserved.
Frank Creel, Ph.D., has been a columnist for the Potomac
News, Woodbridge,
Virginia. His op-ed articles have been published in the Northern
Virginia Journal, the Washington Examiner,
The Washington
Times, and the New York City Tribune. In 1992, his A
Trilogy of Sonnets was published pseudonymously by Christendom
Press.
See a complete biographical sketch.
To subscribe or donate to the FGF E-Package online or
send a check to:
Fitzgerald Griffin Foundation
344 Maple Avenue West, #281
Vienna, VA 22180