FGF E-Package
The Conservative Curmudgeon
September 23, 2009
Political Correctness: A Growing
Threat to Free Speech by Allan C. Brownfeld
ALEXANDRIA, VA — Free speech is now under widespread attack
in the name of political correctness.
In August, Yale University Press announced that the book The
Cartoons That Shook The World, should not include the l2 Danish drawings that
originally appeared in September 2005 and led to protests by Moslems
around the world, including riots and the burning and vandalism of
embassies. At least 200 people were killed.
Yale also decided to eliminate other illustrations of the prophet
Muhammad that were to be included in a children’s book. These
included an Ottoman print and a sketch by the l9th century artist Gustave
Dore of Muhammad being tormented in Hell, as well as an episode from
Dante's “Inferno” that has been depicted by Botticelli,
Blake, Rodin, and Dali.
This acquiesence to political correctness has been widely criticized.
Reza Aslan, a religion scholar and the author of No
god but God: The Origins, Evolution, and Future of Islam, decided to withdraw his supportive
blurb from the book after Yale dropped the pictures. The book is a “definitive
account of the entire controversy,” he said, “but to not
include the actual cartoons is, to me, frankly, idiotic.”
Editorially, The Washington Post declared that, “Yale's self-censorship
establishes a dangerous precedent. If one of the world's most respected
scholarly publishers cannot print these images in context in an academic
work, who can?... In effect, Yale University Press is allowing violent
extremists to set the terms of free speech. As an academic press that
embraces the university’s motto of ‘Lux et Veritas,’ it
should be ashamed.”
Mona Eltahawy, an Egyptian-born commentator who writes and lectures
on Arab and Muslim issues and is a columnist for the Danish newspaper
Politiken, argues that, “Yale University Press has handed a victory
to extremists. Both Yale and the extremists distorting this issue
should be ashamed. I say this as a Muslim who supported the Danish
newspaper Jyllands-Posten’s right to publish the cartoons of
the prophet Muhammad in late 2005, and as someone who also understands
the offense taken at those cartoons by many Muslims, including my mother....”
In Eltahawy's view, “Yale has sided with the various Muslim
dictators and radical groups that used the cartoons to ‘prove’ who
could best ‘defend’ Muhammad against the Danes, and, by
extension, burnish their Islamic credentials. These same dictators
and radicals who complained of the offense to the prophet’s memory
were blind to the greater offense they committed in disregard for human
life. (Indeed, some of those protestors even held banners that said, ‘Behead
those who offend the prophet.’” ... Unfortunately, those
dictators and radicals who want to speak for all Muslims — and yet
care little for Muslim life — have found an ally in Yale University
Press.”
The Yale University Press is hardly alone in challenging the First
Amendment in the name of political correctness.
The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE), which defends
free-speech rights of students and professors across the political
spectrum, shows how censorship is now being administered through college
and university “speech codes,” which are sometimes incorporated
into “codes of conduct.” These edicts ban expressions that
may “offend” students by “insulting” or “harassing” them
on the basis of race, religion, gender, transgender, political affiliations,
and views.
The University of Iowa, for example, forbids sexual harassment that “occurs
when somebody says something sexually related that you don’t
want them to say or do, regardless of what it is.” At Jackson
State University, expressions by students are banned that “degrade,” “insult,” or “taunt” others
as well as “the use of profanity” and “verbal assaults” based
on ethnicity, gender, and the known or presumed beliefs of their fellow
students.
FIRE reports that, “77 per cent of public colleges and universities
maintain speech codes that fail to pass constitutional muster” despite
federal court decisions “unequivocally striking down campus speech
codes on First Amendment grounds from l989 to 2008.”
In August, The New York Times reported of the treatment of the cartoonist
Herge, the creator of his adventurous reporter Tintin, who will be
featured in a Steven Spielberg movie due out in 2011. According
to The Times, "... if you go to the Brooklyn Public Library seeking
a copy of ‘Tintin au Congo,’ Herge’s second book
in a series, prepare to make an appointment and wait days to see the
book. ‘It's not for the public,’ a librarian in the
children’s room said when a patron asked to see it. The book,
published 79 years ago, was moved in 2007 from the public area of the
library to a back room where it is held under lock and key. The move
came after a patron objected, as others have, to the way Africans are
depicted in the book.”
The decision to get rid of a book or restrict access to it goes
to the very heart of a public library. “Policies should
not unjustly exclude materials and resources even if they are offensive
to the librarian and the user,” says the Web site of the American
Library Association, which adds, “Toleration is meaningless without
tolerance for what some may consider detestable.”
Nat Hentoff, a senior fellow at the Cato Institute and one of the
country’s leading advocates of the First Amendment, reports an
incident at Brandeis University. Professor Donald Hindley, a faculty
member for 48 years, teaches a course on Latin American politics. In
2007, he described how Mexican immigrants used to be discriminatorily
called “wetbacks.” An anonymous student complained to the
administration and accused Hindley of using prejudicial language. It
was the first complaint against him in 48 years.
After an investigation, during which Hindley was not told the nature
of the complaint, Brandeis Provost Marty Krauss informed him that, “The
university will not tolerate inappropriate, racial and discriminatory
conduct by members of the faculty.” Threatened with termination,
Hindley was ordered to take a sensitivity training class.
Hentoff notes that Justice Louis Brandeis, after whom the university
is named, would not be pleased. A passionate protector of freedom of
expression, Brandeis wrote in Whitney vs. California, “Those
who won independence believed... that freedom to think as you will
and to speak as you think are... indispensable to the discovery and
spread of political truth.”
Do Americans any longer care about free speech and the First Amendment?
The 2008 annual State of the First Amendment survey by the First Amendment
Center in Nashville found that, “4 in 10 Americans are not able
to name any First Amendment right whatsoever, the highest figure in
the 11-year history of the survey.”
James Madison declared that, “I believe there are more instances
of the abridgement of the freedom of the people by gradual and
silent encroachments of those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations.”
These gradual and silent encroachments upon free speech now underway
deserve the resistance and opposition that all assaults upon freedom
merit, but, unfortunately do not always receive.
[A shorter version of this column is available upon request.]
Allan C. Brownfeld is the author of five books, the latest of which
is The Revolution Lobby (Council for Inter-American Security). He has
been a staff aide to a U.S. Vice President, Members of Congress, and
the U.S. Senate Internal Subcommittee.
He is associate editor of The Lincoln Reveiw and a contributing
editor to such publications as Human Events,
The St. Croix Review, and The Washington Report on Middle
East Affairs.
The Fitzgerald Griffin Foundation needs your help to continue making
these columns available. To make a tax-deductible donation, click
here.