ALEXANDRIA, VA — Honor and integrity used to be important in
the American society. This writer, as a student at the College of William
and Mary, signed the school's Honor Code, which declared that anyone
who stole or cheated would be immediately removed from the College.
This was the first Honor Code adopted at an American college. It reflected
the values of our society. Honor was more valued than anything that
might be gained from dishonor. Professors left the room when students
took exams, and dormitory rooms were often left unlocked.
Now, our society seems to have embraced a different standard of value,
or non-value. Consider just a few recent developments.
• 71 students at New York's elite Stuyvesant High School were
involved in cheating on the state's Regents examinations in Spanish,
U.S. History, English, and Physics. Stuyvesant selectively admits
only the top tier of eighth graders. Stuyvesant High School did not
expel the students involved in cheating — it did not even give them
a failing mark for the exam. Instead, the students remained enrolled
in the school and will be able to retake the exam.
Commenting on this, Frank W. Abagnale, the subject of the book,
movie, and Broadway musical, “Catch Me If You Can,” declared, “We
do not teach ethics at home, and we do not teach ethics in school
because the teacher would be accused of teaching morality. In most
cases, we do not teach ethics in college or even instill ethics in
the workplace.”
• A report issued in mid-July by former FBI Director Louis
Freeh, after an eight-month investigation, concluded that four of
Penn State University’s most powerful leaders — including head football
coach Joe Paterno and the school's president — covered up allegations
of sexual abuse by an assistant coach because they were concerned
about negative publicity. Confronted with reports that Jerry Sandusky lured
boys to the campus where he sexually abused them, Penn State's leadership
deferred to a “culture of reverence for the football program” and
repeatedly “concealed Sandusky's activities from authorities.”
Freeh said that, "Our most saddening and sobering finding is
the total disregard for the safety and welfare of Sandusky's child
victims by the most senior leaders at Penn State."
• Congressional ethics, we know, is an oxymoron. Recently,
Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA), chairman of the House Committee on Oversight
and Government Reform, recently released a report about how some lawmakers
and their staff benefited from a "VIP" loan program not
available to the public that waived fees, cut interest rates, and
eased borrowing standards. Countrywide Financial offered the special
loans in an effort to dissuade lawmakers from voting for stricter
banking regulations. The report names names, with many lawmakers
still in Congress. However, Rep. Issa did not include a letter calling
for the ethics panel to investigate the matter. Without the letter,
the ethics panel is not required to do a thing.
• In Washington, D.C., Mayor Vincent Gray has refused to answer
questions about whether he knew, before or during the 2010 Democratic
mayoral primary, about a secret, well-funded, and illegal “shadow
campaign” on his behalf. More than $653,000 was unlawfully
used to purchase materials and hire workers to secure his victory
over Mayor Adrian Fenty two years ago — money allegedly supplied
by a prominent businessman with significant contractual interests
with the U.S. government. Mayor Gray's campaign slogan was “character,
integrity, leadership.” Three
members of the D.C. Council — and a host of others in the city —
have called for the mayor to resign.
Many books have been written about financial misdeeds on Wall Street,
and about child abuse and cover-ups within the Roman Catholic Church
and among the Orthodox Jewish community in New York. While it may be
true that bad news is news while good news is not, the bad news is
increasingly widespread.
Our crisis in values has been building for some time. The May-June
1988 issue of The Harvard Magazine published an 11-page essay, "Ethics,
The University, and Society," by President Derek Bok. He declared, "The
American nation is greatly in need of some means to civilize new generations
of the people, preparing them to serve as honest, benevolent, productive
citizens of a free society, and all of Harvard's deliberations and
studies and initiatives and earnest concerns have not resulted in any
effective means of Character Education."
Derek Bok concluded: "Despite the importance of moral development
to the individual and the society, one cannot say that higher education
has demonstrated a deep concern for the problem... the subject is not
treated as a serious responsibility worthy of sustained discussion
and determined action... If this situation is to change, there is no
doubt where the initiative must lie. Universities will never do much
to encourage a genuine concern for ethical issues or to help their
students to acquire a strong and carefully considered set of moral
values until presidents and deans take the lead."
Things have deteriorated a great deal since then. It is not only the
values of average Americans that appear to be in a free fall of decline,
but those of our elites may be leading the way. Who in Washington or
Wall Street — or at Penn State — is held responsible for what they
did?
New York Times columnist David Brooks laments about the decline of
today's elites. In the past, he writes, elites “had a stewardship
mentality, that they were temporary caretakers of institutions that
would span generations. They cruelly ostracized people who did not
live up to their codes of gentlemanly conduct and scrupulosity. They
were insular and struggled with intimacy, but they did believe in restraint,
reticence, and service.”
Today's elites, in Brooks' view, are “more talented and open
but lack a self-conscious leadership code. The language of meritocracy
(how to succeed) has eclipsed the language of morality (how to be virtuous).
Wall Street firms, for example, now hire on the basis of youth and
brains, not experience and character. Most of their problems can be
traced to this. If you read the e-mails from the Libor scandal, you
get the same sensation from reading the e-mails in so many recent scandals:
these people are brats; they have no sense that they are guardians
for an institution the world depends on; they have no consciousness
of their larger social role.”
How to reverse our moral decline is not a subject that is being widely
discussed in our contemporary society. It should be. If it is not addressed,
all of us — and our children and grandchildren — will be the losers.
The Conservative Curmudgeon archives
The Conservative Curmudgeon is copyright © 2012
by Allan C. Brownfeld and the Fitzgerald
Griffin Foundation.
All rights reserved. Editors may use this column if this copyright information
is included.
Allan C. Brownfeld is the author of five books, the latest of which
is The Revolution Lobby (Council for Inter-American Security). He has
been a staff aide to a U.S. Vice President, Members of Congress, and
the U.S. Senate Internal Subcommittee.
He is associate editor of The Lincoln Reveiw and a contributing
editor to such publications as Human Events,
The St. Croix Review, and The Washington Report on Middle
East Affairs.
The Fitzgerald Griffin Foundation needs your help to continue making
these columns available. To make a tax-deductible donation, click
here.